Take Growth Score

For corporate venture and venture-client teams

A technical milestone does not tell you what commercial help to commission.

When several start-ups need attention, different sponsors and business units bring different priorities. A technical update may establish that the technology works while leaving the support decision unresolved: what commercial issue needs investigation, who should help and what should they be asked to do?

The support decision

Similar technical progress. Different commercial needs.

Growth Score adds a consistent reading of the company’s reported ability to win and keep customers. Use it with the founder and case owner to investigate the indicated constraint, agree the assignment and return to it at the next review.

Three companies can complete the same technical trial. One cannot yet show that buyers recognise the value. Another has no agreed route from evaluation to a purchase decision. A third wins customers but cannot repeat how they realise value. Each needs a different investigation and a different specialist.

The reading is the founder’s own account, and founders may present themselves favourably when progression depends on the result. It tells you what to examine with them; it does not verify their claims.

Illustrative: three companies, one review

The same milestone does not show what commercial help each company needs.

Commercial needs in this viewNot shown
Starting point for the adviser briefMilestone only
Illustrative, not observed company data. Blue cells mark the area indicated by the company’s responses, not a readiness rating. Technical milestones come from the corporate’s own review; Growth Score does not assess them. People agree any assignment.

The three moments it is useful

Company review, adviser brief, follow-up.

At the company review

Which commercial issue needs investigating?

Alongside the technical update, examine the indicated constraint with the founder and case owner: the customer conversations, decision conditions or delivery evidence behind it.

When briefing a specialist

Who gets external help, to do what?

Decide which companies warrant adviser time. Brief the adviser with the constraint, the evidence already examined, a question to resolve, an owner and a review date.

At the next review

What was done, and what changed?

Return to the previous reading, agreed support and action owner. Check what was done and the customer evidence, then compare a repeat reading on the same method version. Record what still needs attention.

Two buyers, one instrument

The commercial question depends on your role.

Venture-client teams: technology adopted and delivering value.

The objective is useful technology deployed in the business, delivering operating or strategic value. The relationship continues after the pilot: the start-up becomes a supplier the business keeps working with.

Use the reading where the start-up’s commercial capability affects that path: making the value case to the business unit, reaching a commercial decision, supporting the deployment. The blockage may be your own sponsorship, budget or procurement process, so review that alongside it.

What does this company need to become a supplier the business can rely on — and what needs to change on our side?

Corporate investors: support across the portfolio.

The objective is financial and/or strategic portfolio value, according to your mandate. Where the team actively supports holdings, operator and adviser time is limited and each company has an advocate.

Use a common reading to decide which holdings receive commercial support, what the specialist is briefed to do and what to check at the next portfolio review. Combine it with financial, customer and strategic evidence.

Which holding’s commercial issue warrants our support — and what exactly are we commissioning?

What each company receives

A commercial reading the founder can use too.

The company receives its own report: a commercial capability position, the constraint indicated by its responses, and capability considered alongside reported momentum. The founder sees the same constraint the reviewer sees, so the review starts from one account of the problem.

A joint assessment can clarify interpretation. Claims about customers still need to be examined against the relevant records.

Four commercial stages

Interest · Intent · Commitment · Value

Four capability areas

Proposition · People · Process · Repeatability

First engagement

Bring one start-up, the latest review pack and the support decision you need to make.

Record what you would commission from the existing review. Then add the reading, investigate the indicated constraint with the founder and follow the agreed action to the next review.

The test is whether Growth Score reveals a material question, changes the adviser brief or clarifies the next action, and whether that usefulness justifies the total effort for the founder, your team and the adviser.